Paul Berens

Editio Princeps

And here I thought I’d explode out of the starting gate, boldly proclaiming a singular angle for this blog, but it isn’t to be…just yet.

So while it percolates I guess I’ll just write on a smörgåsbord of topics as a diary of sorts for myself and my progeny: a future-proof, censor-free, character-unrestricted Twitter.

Why not begin by wishing you and yours a…

Happy #WorldBookDay 📚

…from this rather slow reader guilty of Tsundoku.

Bedtime Stories

How much more meaningful would Tsundoku be as a concept if it could be quantified? Don’t despair. Introducing the To Prune Or Not To Prune Ratio™:

(current # of books sitting unread on the shelf + estimated acquisitions over the remainder of life) ÷ avg. # of books read per annum ÷ approximate # of years left on this earth (or 'til reading no longer possible)

If the result1 is approaching or greater than one you might consider:

If the result is greater than ~three (and in the absence of personal library like this) get evaluated for possible bibliomania.

Even if I were an e-reader—I’m too bibliosmic to abandon hardcovers—it still behooves me to be thoughtful about what I consume since it’s not only shelf space that is in limited supply but more than anything time2.

My running list.


There are quite a few parallels to Tsundoku when you start thinking about it; digital ones, too: e.g. accumlating podcast episodes at a rate that outstrips your consumption. (The feature of limiting the number of downloaded episodes per podcast is just one of the many reasons to love Pocket Casts—stay tuned for forthcoming Pocket Casts encomium.)


  1. For a more precise approach put your to-read list through the, and add up the hours. 

  2. H/T to Tim Urban who pointed all of this out: that there’s a finite—and estimable—number of things you’ll do in your lifetime (reading being no exception)…a sad reality but there are things to do about it

First published on April 23, 2021